A documented public-source research archive of media coverage, court proceedings, government records, institutional oversight, judicial accountability, public spending, child safety, civil rights, law enforcement, and surveillance issues.
The Georgia Supreme Court disbarred attorney Charles Bruce Singleton Jr. Monday following multiple violations of professional conduct rules across three client matters. The 30-year legal practitioner faced charges including failure to communicate with clients and improper handling of legal work.
In a decisive ruling on Tuesday, the Georgia Supreme Court disbarred an attorney after finding infractions of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct across three separate cases. The attorney was accused of severing communication with clients without formally terminating his representation and withholding settlement funds despite multiple judicial directives. This decision underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining ethical standards within the legal profession, particularly regarding client relationships and fiduciary responsibilities.
The court’s evaluation revealed a pattern of negligence, where the attorney failed to communicate critical information and updates to his clients, essentially leaving them without representation while retaining control over their legal matters. These actions were deemed a breach of trust and professional duty, further compounded by disobedience of court orders to release settlement monies owed to his clients. A more detailed account of the ruling can be explored on Law360.
Such disciplinary measures underscore an ongoing concern within the legal community regarding ethical obligations and the fiduciary duty lawyers owe to their clients. This case is a stark reminder that the fabric of legal practice is intricately tied to the trust and transparency between an attorney and their clients, emphasizing the need for adherence to professional rules laid down by state bars.
The Georgia Supreme Court’s decision to disbar rather than impose a lesser penalty reflects the seriousness with which these violations are regarded. It sends a clear message that deviations from professional conduct, especially those affecting client welfare and trust, will be met with stringent consequences. These actions align with broader efforts within the legal industry to ensure stringent adherence to ethical standards as public confidence in legal professionals continues to be paramount.
For legal practitioners, this case serves as an important reminder to continually review and adhere to ethical guidelines, ensuring they uphold the professional standards expected by courts and clients alike. The emphasis remains on transparent communication and proper management of client funds, which are vital components of legal accountability and integrity.
Nathan Gingles looks around after he was placed in an interrogation room.
Gingles was arrested and charged with the Feb. 16, 2025, murders of his wife, her father and a neighbor in Tamarac, Florida. Broward State Attorney’s Office
The attorneys appointed to represent the man accused of gunning down his estranged wife, her father and a neighbor in Tamarac can withdraw from the case, a judge ruled Friday morning.
Broward Circuit Court Judge Marina Garcia-Wood granted the request of Nathan Gingles’ attorneys after they said there was a “conflict of interest” and “irreconcilable differences to an extreme degree.”
Nathan, 44, is accused of kidnapping his daughter after the Feb. 16, 2025, rampage that killed Mary Gingles, 34, his estranged wife, her father David Ponzer, 64, and Andrew Ferrin, 36.
BSO deputies found Nathan and Seraphine at a North Lauderdale Walmart later that afternoon, where he was arrested.
Seraphine, who was placed with a foster family by state authorities, told detectives she witnessed the murders — and that her father said they were going to visit family in Texas.
Nathan, who has pleaded not guilty, is facing the death penalty if he is convicted.
In a court filing, attorneys Kaitlin Gonzalez, Maury Halperin and Maria Della Guardia said Nathan “harbors fixed beliefs about the Office of Regional Counsel which create a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.”
The Office of Regional Counsel is made up of attorneys who are appointed to cases when the public defender’s office has a conflict of interest.
The attorneys didn’t divulge details in their filings or in court on Friday. However, jail calls obtained by the Miami Herald last month provide insight into Nathan’s troubled relationship with his attorneys.
In several calls, Nathan appeared to be paranoid about his legal representation, telling a friend that his attorneys are “actively working against me” and “working with the prosecutors against my best interest.”
In several calls, Nathan appeared to be paranoid about his legal representation, telling a friend that his attorneys are “actively working against me” and “working with the prosecutors against my best interest.”
Nathan added that he was looking for an attorney in North Florida to take his case. But hiring an attorney would cost about $250,000.
“Put the word out that they’re not to be trusted,” Nathan told his friend.
A planned ambush?
At 6:30 a.m. that Sunday, Nathan, clad in black, showed up at Mary’s house at 5987 North Plum Bay Parkway in Tamarac, first shooting Mary’s father to death as he drank coffee on the back patio, according to BSO.
He then chased Mary down the street with a semiautomatic handgun equipped with a silencer, killing Mary and Ferrin, whose home she sought refuge through an unlocked door, deputies say. Seraphine, barefoot, ran to keep up with her father, crying, “Daddy, please don’t.”
She trailed him as he shot her mother “100 times,” she told deputies.
Mary called BSO 14 times in the last year of her life, meticulously documenting her estranged husband’s behavior and repeatedly pleading with law enforcement to help her because she feared for her life.
Earlier that year, BSO seized Nathan’s 12 firearms, including semiautomatic shotguns, rifles and handguns, six suppressors and 660 rounds of ammunition.
BSO deputies then returned them after Nathan and Mary, both U.S. Army vets, had worked out a custody agreement with their daughter. They were supposed to seize them again in the weeks before her death, but didn’t.
“[Nathan] has already taken steps to prepare to murder me, but is waiting for the opportune time,” Mary said in a court filing before her slaying.
Eight Broward Sheriff Office deputies were fired following an internal investigation into the agency’s bungled handling of the shooting scene and lack of urgent response to Mary’s calls.
Instead of going to the scene that morning, deputies met at a “rallying point” just outside the Tamarac neighborhood.
Mary and Ferrin, Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony said, would likely be alive had deputies rushed to the scene in the minutes after the first 911 call
