Florida Supreme Court sanctions Judge Stefanie C. Moon over campaign, ethics violations
Published: July 22, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Updated: July 23, 2025 at 9:20 AM
BROWARD COUNTY, Fla. — The Florida Supreme Court has formally sanctioned Broward County Circuit Judge Stefanie C. Moon for multiple violations of judicial ethics, ordering a 10-day suspension without pay, a $2,115.40 fine, and a mandatory public reprimand before the state’s highest court.
In a unanimous decision issued July 17, the court approved a negotiated resolution between Judge Moon and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC), which had brought forward three separate complaints against her. The court described her conduct as “unacceptable” and warned that any future violations would not be tolerated.
Judge Moon admitted to violating several provisions of the Florida Code of Judicial Conduct in three unrelated incidents:
Improper Campaign Solicitation: While presiding from the bench and wearing her judicial robe, Judge Moon asked an attorney—who had just completed a hearing before her—why he had not returned her call about joining her re-election committee. The Supreme Court noted this left the attorney concerned that a failure to support Moon’s campaign could negatively impact his clients.
Prohibited Ex Parte Communication: In a separate divorce case, Judge Moon spoke directly with the mental health therapist of one of the parties involved—outside the presence of both parties or their attorneys—a clear violation of Canon 3B(7)(a) of the judicial code.
Improper Political Contributions: Between 2020 and 2024, Moon made approximately $2,000 in donations to political campaigns and organizations, including ActBlue and the Biden-Harris campaign funds. Under Canon 7A(1)(e), judges are strictly barred from contributing to political candidates or parties.
These actions violate Canons 1, 2A, 3B(7)(a), and 7A(1)(e), all of which are designed to protect public confidence in the impartiality and integrity of the judiciary.
The court emphasized that Moon had already been cautioned by the JQC in 2019 for previous campaign-related misconduct. Despite that, she went on to commit the current offenses in completely unrelated matters, raising deeper concerns about her adherence to judicial standards.
In its ruling, the court wrote:
“Our Court does not often come upon a judicial discipline case in which a single judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct in such distinct ways in wholly unrelated incidents. Judge Moon’s conduct is unacceptable…”
Still, the JQC recommended a relatively moderate penalty, citing Moon’s cooperation, expression of remorse, and acceptance of responsibility. The Supreme Court deferred to the Commission’s disciplinary recommendation but made clear its tolerance has limits:
“The Court cannot tolerate any further misconduct by Judge Moon.”
Judge Moon will serve a 10-day unpaid suspension, to begin on a date chosen by the Chief Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit (Broward County).
She must pay $2,115.40, equivalent to the amount of her improper political contributions.
She will appear before the Florida Supreme Court for a public reprimand, with the date to be scheduled by the Clerk of Court.
Read the ruling below:
About The Author
Jeff Weinsier
Jeff Weinsier joined Local 10 News in September 1994. He is currently an investigative reporter for Local 10. He is also responsible for the very popular Dirty Dining segments.
INQUIRY CONCERNING JQC 2024 452 2024 506 2025 161 MOON v. << (2025)
Supreme Court of Florida.
INQUIRY CONCERNING a Judge JQC Nos. 2024-452, 2024-506 & 2025-161 re: Stefanie C. MOON.
No. SC2025-0071
Decided: July 17, 2025
Gregory W. Coleman, Chair, and Hugh R. Brown, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, Florida, for Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission, Petitioner Scott K. Tozian, Tampa, Florida, for Judge Stefanie C. Moon, Respondent
Before the Court is a stipulation to resolve several charges by the Judicial Qualifications Commission against Judge Stefanie C. Moon of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. Judge Moon has admitted to Code of Judicial Conduct violations involving inappropriate campaign activity, prohibited ex parte communication, and prohibited political contributions. The Commission and Judge Moon agree that she should be suspended for 10 days without pay, fined $2,115, and publicly reprimanded. To that end, the parties have filed with our Court a Second Amended Stipulation and Amended Findings and Recommendations of Discipline. We accept the second amended stipulation and findings and will impose the recommended discipline. See art. V, § 12(c)(1), Fla. Const. (authorizing the Court to accept, reject, or modify the Commission's findings and recommendations).
The second amended stipulation would resolve three Commission cases pending against Judge Moon. Judge Moon first admits that, from the bench and while wearing her robe, she asked an attorney why he had not returned her call about serving on her re-election committee. The attorney had just completed a hearing before the judge, and the question left the attorney concerned about whether his failure to support Judge Moon's campaign would hurt his clients. Second, Judge Moon admits that she engaged in ex parte communication with the mental health therapist of a party in a divorce case pending before her. Finally, Judge Moon admits that between 2020 and 2024 she made financial contributions totaling approximately $2,000 to political organizations and candidates, including ActBlue and the campaign funds of President Biden and Vice President Harris.
Judge Moon's conduct implicates multiple provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. Judges must always act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Fla Code Jud. Conduct, Canons 1 & 2A. Except in limited circumstances, judges may not engage in communication about a pending or impending proceeding outside the presence of the parties. Id. Canon 3B(7)(a). And judges may not make financial contributions to political organizations or candidates. Id. Canon 7A(1)(e). Judge Moon's acknowledgement that she has violated these canons is amply supported by the record.
Our Court does not often come upon a judicial discipline case in which a single judge has violated the Code of Judicial Conduct in such distinct ways in wholly unrelated incidents. Judge Moon's conduct is unacceptable, especially given that the Commission had already cautioned her in 2019 for improper campaign activities. Nonetheless, the Commission's recommended discipline in this matter credits Judge Moon for cooperation, remorse, and acceptance of responsibility. While we defer to the Commission's assessment of the judge's contrition, we stress that the Court cannot tolerate any further misconduct by Judge Moon.
We approve the Second Amended Stipulation and Amended Findings and Recommendations of Discipline in this matter. Judge Moon is hereby suspended from her judicial duties for 10 days, without pay, effective on a date within 30 days of the issuance of this opinion and as determined by the Chief Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit. We order Judge Moon to pay a fine of $2,115.40, an amount equal to her improper political contributions. And finally, we order Judge Moon to appear before this Court for the administration of a public reprimand at a time to be established by the Clerk of this Court.
It is so ordered.
PER CURIAM.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.
https://www.local10.com/news/local/2025/07/22/florida-supreme-court-sanctions-judge-stefanie-c-moon-over-campaign-ethics-violations/
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://flcourts-media.flcourts.gov/content/download/2454803/opinion/Opinion_SC2025-0071.pdf
